GDXD
Price
$51.78
Change
+$1.49 (+2.96%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:21 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
126.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLL
Price
$23.95
Change
+$0.40 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
108.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXD vs GLL

Header iconGDXD vs GLL Comparison
Open Charts GDXD vs GLLBanner chart's image
GDXD vs GLL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) vs. ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXD offers -3x inverse daily exposure to the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, which tracks a market-cap weighted combination of GDX (senior gold miners) and GDXJ (junior gold miners), providing leveraged bets against gold mining equities.
  • GLL delivers -2x inverse daily performance of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (SM), targeting direct declines in gold bullion futures prices via derivatives like swaps and futures.
  • Both are high-risk, daily-reset leveraged inverse products suited for short-term trading; GDXD as an ETN carries issuer credit risk from Bank of Montreal, while GLL is an ETF structured as a commodity pool.
  • Expense ratios are identical at 0.95%, but GDXD's higher leverage (-3x) amplifies volatility compared to GLL's -2x, with gold miners often exhibiting greater sensitivity to metal prices and operational risks.
  • GDXD thrives when gold miners underperform gold prices (e.g., due to costs or equity-specific issues), while GLL benefits purely from falling spot gold amid rate hikes or risk-on sentiment.
  • Recent gold price strength has pressured both inverse products, highlighting their role in tactical hedging rather than long-term holds due to compounding effects.

Introduction

In the current market environment marked by gold's surge past $4,600 per ounce amid geopolitical tensions, central bank buying, and rate cut expectations, inverse gold-related ETFs like GDXD and GLL offer tactical tools for traders anticipating pullbacks. While both provide bearish exposure, they diverge significantly: GDXD targets gold mining equities, which amplify gold price moves but face company-specific risks like production costs and equity volatility, whereas GLL inversely tracks gold bullion futures directly. This comparison suits investors seeking alternatives for hedging long gold positions or speculating on sector rotation away from precious metals in a strengthening economy or rising yields.

MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) Overview

The MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD), issued by Bank of Montreal, is an exchange-traded note (ETN) launched in December 2020 with maturity in 2040. It seeks daily investment results equal to three times the inverse (-3x) of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, compounded daily, minus fees. This index provides market-cap weighted exposure to two ETFs: approximately 75% GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF, focusing on large-cap producers) and 25% GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, smaller explorers and developers). GDXD holds no direct securities, achieving synthetic exposure through the ETN structure linked to the index's volume-weighted average price (VWAP) closing level.

Key structural traits include a 0.95% expense ratio (via daily investor fee), daily leverage reset, and quarterly index rebalancing. Sector allocation is 100% gold/silver mining equities, concentrated in Canada, South Africa, and Australia. Top underlying holdings via GDX/GDXJ include majors like Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, and Barrick Gold. As an unsecured debt obligation, it introduces issuer credit risk. Liquidity is supported by NYSE Arca listing, though minimum redemption is 25,000 ETNs.

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) Overview

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL), issued by ProShares since December 2008, is a commodity pool ETF seeking daily results corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (SM), before fees. This subindex reflects COMEX gold futures performance, providing direct inverse exposure to gold bullion prices without physical holdings. GLL employs derivatives including futures contracts (e.g., GOLD 100 OZ FUTR) and swaps with counterparties like Citibank and UBS for its targeted leverage, resetting daily.

The fund's expense ratio is 0.95%, with no direct holdings in gold or miners—portfolio is dominated by short futures and swap positions (top exposures: -68.92% gold futures, various swaps). It generates a K-1 tax form due to its commodity pool status. Sector allocation is purely commodities (gold futures), offering unadulterated bearish gold price positioning. Listed on NYSE Arca, GLL exhibits solid liquidity for short-term trades, though compounding and volatility decay impact multi-day holds.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold sector operates amid robust tailwinds, with spot gold reaching record highs above $4,600/oz in early 2026, driven by safe-haven demand from Middle East conflicts, U.S. debt concerns, and anticipated Federal Reserve rate cuts. Central banks continue accumulation, while ETF inflows persist despite volatility. Gold miners, however, face headwinds from rising all-in sustaining costs (AISC), labor issues, and regulatory hurdles in key jurisdictions like Canada and Australia. Macro drivers include a potentially stronger U.S. dollar and higher yields pressuring bullion, alongside commodity supercycle risks. Sector risks encompass geopolitical supply disruptions and environmental regulations, with capital flows favoring direct gold over equities in uncertain cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, gold's rally has challenged both inverse ETFs, with GLL declining amid sustained bullion strength from geopolitical risks and easing expectations, while GDXD has faced amplified losses due to its -3x leverage and miners' partial catch-up via higher prices offsetting cost pressures. Gold miners have shown higher volatility than spot gold across cycles, benefiting GDXD in periods of equity underperformance (e.g., poor earnings or M&A (mergers and acquisitions) disappointments). GLL's lower leverage results in smoother relative declines but less upside in sharp gold drops. Volatility profiles differ markedly: GDXD's equity focus heightens sensitivity to sector rotation, while GLL ties directly to futures curves and roll yields.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in volatile sectors like precious metals.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors GLL over GDXD due to its lower leverage (-2x vs. -3x), reducing volatility decay in sideways markets, ETF structure avoiding ETN credit risk, and purer exposure to gold prices amid persistent bullion momentum. GDXD's higher beta to miners suits aggressive shorts on equity-specific weakness, but GLL offers superior cost efficiency and trend consistency for hedging in the prevailing macro environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXD vs. GLL commentary
Jun 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXD is a StrongBuy and GLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXD has more net assets: 126M vs. GLL (108M). GLL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXD: GLL (-9.943) vs GDXD (-40.696). GDXD was incepted earlier than GLL: GDXD (6 years) vs GLL (18 years). GDXD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than GLL (1.26).
GDXDGLLGDXD / GLL
Gain YTD-40.696-9.943409%
Net Assets126M108M117%
Total Expense Ratio0.951.2675%
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence6 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXDGLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLDAX42.82N/A
N/A
Gabelli Gold A
FGTAX33.11N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock A
SCNUX12.78N/A
N/A
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund Inv
PGTDX81.18N/A
N/A
Putnam Global Technology C
CNGLX22.05N/A
N/A
Commonwealth Global