GDXJ
Price
$115.89
Change
-$3.60 (-3.01%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Net Assets
8.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGDM
Price
$73.82
Change
-$1.63 (-2.16%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Net Assets
666.78M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs SGDM

GDXJ vs SGDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXJ provides targeted exposure to small- and mid-cap junior gold and silver miners, while SGDM focuses on mid- to large-cap gold miners selected through a custom factors-based index emphasizing revenue growth, profitability, and balance sheet strength.
  • GDXJ typically holds a larger number of securities (around 80–120) for broader diversification within the junior segment, whereas SGDM maintains a more concentrated portfolio (around 40–50 holdings).
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track specialized gold mining indices, but GDXJ exhibits higher volatility due to its emphasis on smaller, earlier-stage companies with greater exploration risk.
  • Expense ratios are competitive, with GDXJ at 0.52% and SGDM at 0.46%, making SGDM slightly more cost-efficient for long-term holders.
  • Both funds offer pure-play exposure to the gold mining sector, serving as alternatives for investors seeking equity participation in gold price movements without direct physical metal ownership.
  • Structural differences position GDXJ for higher-beta upside in strong gold bull markets driven by junior company outperformance, while SGDM offers relatively more stable exposure through its focus on established producers.

Introduction

Gold mining equities represent a leveraged way for investors to gain exposure to gold prices and sector-specific dynamics. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) both target this space but pursue distinct strategies within it. GDXJ emphasizes smaller exploration and development companies, while SGDM applies factor screens to larger producers. The comparison helps investors evaluate trade-offs in risk, diversification, and cost when allocating to gold miners amid fluctuating commodity prices and macroeconomic conditions.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and silver mining, including those in exploration and early development stages. The fund typically holds 80–120 securities, providing broad exposure across global junior miners. Top holdings often include companies such as Equinox Gold and other mid-tier producers with significant exploration upside. Sector allocation is concentrated in basic materials, specifically precious metals mining. The expense ratio stands at 0.52%. GDXJ is a passive, market-cap-weighted ETF with annual rebalancing tied to index methodology. Its structure suits investors seeking higher-risk, higher-reward exposure within the gold mining theme.

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) Overview

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) tracks the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. This rules-based index selects and weights gold mining companies based on factors including revenue growth, EBITDA margins, and debt-to-equity ratios, favoring financially robust producers. The fund typically holds 40–50 securities, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of mid- to large-cap names. Top holdings commonly feature established producers such as Agnico Eagle Mines, Barrick Gold, and Newmont. Allocation remains focused on basic materials with an emphasis on senior gold miners. The expense ratio is 0.46%. SGDM is a passively managed ETF employing a factor-enhanced selection process with periodic index reconstitution. Its design appeals to investors preferring quality-oriented exposure within the gold mining sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold mining sector is influenced by gold price trends, inflation expectations, interest rate environments, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into precious metals equities often accelerate during periods of monetary easing or heightened uncertainty. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards can affect project timelines for both junior and senior producers. Macro drivers such as central bank gold purchases and currency movements provide broader support, while rising operating costs and labor challenges represent ongoing sector risks. Both ETFs operate within this thematic environment, with performance sensitive to commodity cycles rather than broad equity market rotations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has demonstrated greater sensitivity to gold price rallies due to the operational leverage and growth potential of smaller miners, though this comes with elevated volatility during downturns. Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has shown comparatively steadier behavior, benefiting from its focus on profitable, lower-leverage producers that tend to weather cost pressures more effectively. Relative positioning highlights GDXJ’s potential for amplified returns in favorable gold environments versus SGDM’s emphasis on quality metrics that may moderate drawdowns. Sector momentum tied to earnings from major holdings and broader commodity trends continues to drive differentiation between the two strategies over multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics including cost efficiency, diversification within the gold mining theme, and factor-based selection for financial quality, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) for investors prioritizing balanced risk exposure in the sector. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) remains compelling for those seeking higher-beta participation in junior miner upside. The assessment draws from observable index methodologies and expense profiles rather than short-term price action.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. SGDM commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a StrongBuy and SGDM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 8.69B vs. SGDM (667M). SGDM has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXJ: SGDM (6.018) vs GDXJ (1.854). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SGDM: GDXJ (17 years) vs SGDM (12 years). SGDM (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than GDXJ (0.52). SGDM has a higher turnover GDXJ (36.00) vs GDXJ (36.00).
GDXJSGDMGDXJ / SGDM
Gain YTD1.8546.01831%
Net Assets8.69B667M1,303%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.46113%
Turnover36.0059.0061%
Yield2.761.18234%
Fund Existence17 years12 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJSGDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SGDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETY14.820.09
+0.61%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
NBJP37.230.19
+0.51%
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF
SIFI43.520.15
+0.35%
Harbor Ares Systematic Mltsct Inc ETF
FINS12.680.03
+0.24%
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust
AOTS23.24N/A
N/A
AOT Software Platform ETF

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
-3.01%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-9.70%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
CGAU - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
AGI - GDXJ
89%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
More

SGDM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGDM
1D Price
Change %
SGDM100%
-2.16%
AEM - SGDM
96%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
WPM - SGDM
95%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
NEM - SGDM
92%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
IAG - SGDM
92%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
PAAS - SGDM
92%
Closely correlated
-9.70%
More