GDXJ
Price
$128.05
Change
+$5.77 (+4.72%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Net Assets
9.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGDM
Price
$82.82
Change
+$1.62 (+2.00%)
Updated
Sep 3, 11:40 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
696.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs SGDM

GDXJ vs SGDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXJ provides targeted exposure to smaller, higher-risk junior gold and silver miners through a market-cap-weighted index, while SGDM focuses on larger gold producers with a custom factors overlay emphasizing revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low debt-to-equity ratios.
  • GDXJ holds approximately 120 securities with greater diversification across global junior miners, whereas SGDM maintains about 50 holdings concentrated in established North American producers, resulting in higher concentration risk for SGDM.
  • SGDM offers a lower net expense ratio of 0.46% compared to GDXJ’s 0.52%, providing a modest cost advantage for long-term investors seeking efficiency within the precious metals sector.
  • Both ETFs track passive strategies in the gold mining industry but differ in market-cap focus: GDXJ emphasizes small-capitalization companies with higher beta to gold prices, while SGDM tilts toward larger, more stable firms with quarterly rebalancing.
  • Structural differences position GDXJ for investors seeking leveraged upside from early-stage miners, whereas SGDM suits those preferring factor-enhanced exposure to established producers with potentially lower volatility in certain market cycles.
  • Geographic allocations show GDXJ with broader international reach including Australia and emerging markets, contrasted with SGDM’s heavier weighting toward Canada and the United States.

Introduction

Gold mining exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have attracted renewed attention amid fluctuating commodity prices and macroeconomic uncertainty. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) both deliver equity exposure to the precious metals sector but pursue distinct approaches within the same industry. They do not compete directly; instead, they offer complementary strategies for investors seeking gold-related returns—one emphasizing smaller exploration and development companies and the other focusing on established producers with quantitative factor enhancements. This comparison highlights their structural attributes to help investors align selections with risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets small-capitalization companies deriving at least 50% of revenues from gold and/or silver mining, royalties, or streaming activities, or those with projects expected to meet the same threshold upon development. The fund typically holds around 120 securities and maintains a net expense ratio of 0.52%. Top holdings often include Equinox Gold Corp (EQX), Evolution Mining Ltd (EVN), Alamos Gold Inc (AGI), Endeavour Mining Plc (EDV), and Coeur Mining Inc (CDE). Geographic exposure spans Canada, Australia, the United States, and select emerging markets, with nearly all assets in basic materials. GDXJ employs full replication where feasible and offers high liquidity relative to its underlying holdings.

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) Overview

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index before fees and expenses. The index applies a rules-based methodology that starts with market capitalization and adjusts weights based on factors including higher revenue growth, elevated free cash flow yield, and lower long-term debt-to-equity ratios. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and carries a net expense ratio of 0.46%. Prominent holdings frequently feature Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), Barrick Mining Corp (ABX), Newmont Corp (NEM), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corp (FNV). The portfolio concentrates in Canada and the United States, with the index reconstituted quarterly. SGDM focuses exclusively on gold companies listed on major North American exchanges and emphasizes larger-capitalization producers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold mining sector operates within a broader precious metals ecosystem influenced by gold price movements, interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into miners often intensify during periods of economic uncertainty or monetary easing, while regulatory changes affecting mining permits and environmental standards can impact operations. Both ETFs benefit from gold’s role as a safe-haven asset, yet they face risks including operational challenges at mines, input cost inflation, and sensitivity to broader equity market sentiment. Recent market cycles have highlighted varying responses to commodity trends and sector rotation, underscoring the importance of understanding fund construction when navigating these dynamics.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDXJ has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its focus on junior miners, which tend to amplify gold price movements due to their earlier-stage operations and smaller size. SGDM, with its emphasis on larger producers and factor tilts, has shown relatively more stable behavior in certain environments, potentially benefiting from stronger balance sheets and cash flow characteristics. Relative positioning reflects these differences: GDXJ offers greater sensitivity to exploration success and gold price rallies, while SGDM may provide more consistent exposure during periods of sector consolidation or earnings cycles favoring established operators. Investors evaluating fund performance should consider how each structure interacts with macroeconomic shifts such as interest rate changes or commodity supply dynamics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. For investors comparing ETFs like GDXJ and SGDM, the platform provides additional quantitative insights to support informed decision-making.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to SGDM. The ETF’s lower expense ratio, factor-enhanced weighting methodology, and concentration in larger, financially stronger gold producers contribute to a profile with potentially favorable risk-adjusted characteristics and cost efficiency. GDXJ remains a compelling option for those seeking higher-beta exposure to junior miners and broader geographic diversification, though its higher expense ratio and greater volatility may warrant careful consideration in portfolio construction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. SGDM commentary
Sep 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a StrongBuy and SGDM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 9.2B vs. SGDM (697M). SGDM has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXJ: SGDM (16.616) vs GDXJ (12.542). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SGDM: GDXJ (17 years) vs SGDM (12 years). SGDM (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than GDXJ (0.52). SGDM has a higher turnover GDXJ (36.00) vs GDXJ (36.00).
GDXJSGDMGDXJ / SGDM
Gain YTD12.54216.61675%
Net Assets9.2B697M1,320%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.46113%
Turnover36.0059.0061%
Yield2.070.89233%
Fund Existence17 years12 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJSGDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SGDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DECT40.220.16
+0.39%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF
TUG46.030.07
+0.16%
STF Tactical Growth ETF
BSCU16.440.01
+0.06%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corp Bd ETF
CZAR33.01N/A
N/A
Themes ETF Trust Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
FTMU7.64N/A
-0.01%
Franklin Municipal Income ETF