SGDM
Price
$71.44
Change
-$2.36 (-3.20%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Net Assets
644.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WPM
Price
$133.69
Change
-$3.96 (-2.88%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
61.6B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGDM vs WPM

SGDM vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 30, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Key Takeaways

  • SGDM is a passive ETF tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index with approximately 49 holdings focused on gold mining companies, while WPM is a single precious metals streaming and royalty company that represents a significant top holding within SGDM.
  • SGDM offers broad sector exposure primarily to basic materials (gold and precious metals) with geographic concentration in Canada (around 75%) and the United States, providing diversification across multiple miners and royalty firms including WPM.
  • SGDM carries an expense ratio of 0.46%, reflecting its rules-based index methodology with quarterly rebalancing, whereas WPM as a corporate equity has no fund-level expense ratio but exposes investors to company-specific operational and commodity price risks.
  • Both target precious metals themes but differ in structure: SGDM delivers diversified equity exposure to gold miners and streamers, while WPM provides direct participation in a leading royalty/streaming business with agreements tied to gold, silver, and other metals production.
  • SGDM's factor-tilted approach emphasizes larger gold companies with strong revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low debt-to-equity ratios, contrasting with WPM's business model centered on long-term streaming contracts that can offer more stable margins during commodity cycles.
  • Investors seeking diversified precious metals equity exposure may favor SGDM's multi-holding structure, while those targeting concentrated exposure to a high-quality royalty operator may consider WPM alongside or instead of the ETF.

Introduction

SGDM and WPM both provide exposure to the precious metals sector, particularly gold and related mining activities, making them relevant for investors navigating commodity cycles, inflation hedging, and sector rotation in the current macroeconomic environment. SGDM functions as a diversified ETF holding multiple gold mining and royalty companies, while WPM operates as a single prominent royalty and streaming firm that appears as one of SGDM's largest positions. They do not compete directly as identical products but offer alternative or complementary ways to access similar thematic goals within precious metals equities.

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) Overview

SGDM is the Sprott Gold Miners ETF, a passive, index-tracking fund listed on NYSE Arca that seeks to replicate the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index before fees and expenses. The index employs a rules-based methodology to select larger-sized gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges, emphasizing factors such as revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low long-term debt-to-equity ratios. The ETF typically holds around 49 issuers, with top holdings including Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), Barrick Mining Corporation (ABX), Newmont Corp. (NEM), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Sector allocation centers on basic materials, with the majority in gold mining and a smaller portion in other precious metals. The expense ratio stands at 0.46%, and the index undergoes quarterly reconstitution. Geographic exposure concentrates in Canada and the United States, with liquidity supported by its exchange listing and established issuer Sprott.

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) Overview

WPM is Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., a leading precious metals streaming and royalty company whose shares trade on major U.S. exchanges. Unlike a fund, WPM generates revenue through long-term streaming agreements and royalties tied to the production of gold, silver, and other metals from mining partners, without direct operational involvement in mining. As a corporate equity, it does not maintain an expense ratio in the manner of an ETF. Its business model focuses on providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for future metal deliveries at predetermined prices, offering exposure to precious metals prices with potentially lower operating costs than traditional miners. WPM frequently ranks among the largest positions in gold miners ETFs such as SGDM due to its scale and diversified streaming portfolio across multiple jurisdictions and commodities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals sector, encompassing gold mining and royalty/streaming businesses, responds to macroeconomic drivers including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, central bank gold purchases, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into gold-related equities often accelerate during periods of economic uncertainty or when real yields decline. Regulatory environments in key producing regions such as Canada and emerging markets influence permitting and production timelines, while commodity price volatility affects margins for both miners and streamers. Sector risks include operational challenges at mine sites, changes in tax or royalty regimes, and shifts in global supply chains. Both SGDM and WPM operate within this environment, with royalty models like WPM potentially offering relative stability through contractual cash flows compared to pure mining operations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SGDM has delivered exposure to a basket of gold equities whose collective performance reflects broader sector momentum driven by gold prices, earnings from top miners, and rotation into defensive commodities. Its diversified holdings, including significant weight in WPM, can moderate volatility relative to single-stock positions. WPM's returns have historically tracked precious metals prices with the added benefit of streaming contract margins that may exhibit resilience across price environments. Relative positioning shows SGDM providing broader participation across the gold mining value chain, while WPM offers concentrated leverage to royalty economics. Differences in volatility arise from SGDM's multi-name diversification versus WPM's company-specific factors such as deal flow and partner production levels. Both have responded to interest rate cycles and commodity trends in recent weeks and months, with positioning favoring quality operators amid evolving macro conditions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to SGDM. The ETF’s diversified holdings across approximately 49 issuers, factor-based index methodology targeting quality metrics, and established expense ratio of 0.46% provide a balanced risk profile and broad precious metals equity exposure. While WPM offers attractive direct participation in a leading royalty business and serves as a key component within SGDM, the ETF’s multi-holding construction and rules-driven rebalancing support more consistent sector momentum capture with reduced single-entity concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SGDM vs. WPM commentary
Oct 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGDM is a Hold and WPM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WPM: Fundamental Ratings
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGDMWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
SGDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOTJ27.08-0.18
-0.68%
Bank of the James Financial Group
TRON1.28-0.01
-0.78%
Tron Inc
GXAI0.45-0.01
-2.51%
Gaxosai
LSCC130.99-3.48
-2.59%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp
AMBA65.33-2.61
-3.84%
Ambarella

SGDM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGDM
1D Price
Change %
SGDM100%
-3.20%
AEM - SGDM
96%
Closely correlated
-3.03%
WPM - SGDM
95%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
IAG - SGDM
93%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
NEM - SGDM
93%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
PAAS - SGDM
91%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
More