Ad is loading...
GDXJ vs SLVP
GDXJ vs SLVP Comparison
Open Charts GDXJ vs SLVP
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Price$47.00
Change-$0.08 (-0.17%)
Volume$17.03K
Net Assets4.86B
iShares MSCI Global Silver&Mtls Mnrs ETF
Price$12.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Volume$71.46K
Net Assets226.17M
GDXJ vs SLVP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDXJ vs. SLVP commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a Hold and SLVP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 4.86B vs. SLVP (226M). GDXJ has a higher annual dividend yield than SLVP: GDXJ (9.965) vs SLVP (8.752). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SLVP: GDXJ (15 years) vs SLVP (13 years). SLVP has a higher turnover GDXJ (20.00) vs GDXJ (20.00).
| GDXJ | SLVP | GDXJ / SLVP | |
| Gain YTD | 9.965 | 8.752 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 226M | 2,150% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 26.00 | 77% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 0.88 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDXJ | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 18 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GDXJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDXJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| AEM - GDXJ | 91% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| PAAS - GDXJ | 90% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| KGC - GDXJ | 88% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| AGI - GDXJ | 88% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| MAG - GDXJ | 86% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
SLVP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVP has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLVP jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVP | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| PAAS - SLVP | 94% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| HL - SLVP | 89% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| MAG - SLVP | 87% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AEM - SLVP | 84% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| WPM - SLVP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||