GDXY
Price
$11.28
Change
-$0.09 (-0.79%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
332.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLDM
Price
$86.22
Change
-$1.51 (-1.72%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
32.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXY vs GLDM

GDXY vs GLDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) vs. SPDR Gold MiniShares (GLDM)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXY employs an actively managed synthetic covered call strategy on the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) to generate weekly income while offering limited participation in gold miners’ price movements, resulting in an expense ratio of 1.00%.
  • GLDM provides direct, unleveraged exposure to physical gold bullion through a passively managed trust structure with a low expense ratio of 0.10%, tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM.
  • Structural differences position GDXY as an income-oriented thematic product with capped upside and higher volatility from options overlay, whereas GLDM delivers straightforward commodity exposure with minimal operational complexity.
  • Both ETFs target gold-related themes but diverge significantly in risk profile: GDXY introduces options and single-issuer concentration risks, while GLDM focuses on bullion price fluctuations without equity or derivatives exposure.
  • Cost efficiency favors GLDM for long-term holders seeking pure gold price tracking, while GDXY may appeal to investors prioritizing current income generation within the gold miners sector.
  • Relative positioning reflects distinct investor objectives—enhanced yield versus direct commodity allocation—within the broader precious metals environment.

Introduction

Investors seeking gold-related exposure face a choice between equity-linked income strategies and direct bullion holdings. GDXY and GLDM address overlapping yet distinct goals: one through options-based income on gold miners and the other via physical gold ownership. They do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for participants in the gold ecosystem, allowing differentiation based on income needs, cost sensitivity, and risk tolerance in the current macroeconomic setting.

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) Overview

GDXY is an actively managed ETF launched in May 2024 that seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the price returns of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX), subject to a cap on potential gains. The fund implements a synthetic covered call strategy using options on GDX, combined with U.S. Treasury collateral. It holds approximately 19 positions, with significant allocations to short-term Treasury bills and various GDX call options. The gross expense ratio stands at 1.00%. As a non-diversified, options-overlay product, GDXY features weekly distributions and limited upside participation inherent to the covered call approach.

SPDR Gold MiniShares (GLDM) Overview

GLDM is a passively managed exchange-traded trust launched in June 2018 that seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less expenses. The fund holds physical gold as its primary asset and maintains a single-holding structure. It features a low gross expense ratio of 0.10% and no options or equity exposure. GLDM provides direct, unleveraged access to gold price movements through a transparent, physically backed vehicle listed on NYSE Arca, emphasizing cost efficiency and simplicity for commodity investors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold sector benefits from macroeconomic drivers including interest rate expectations, geopolitical tensions, and inflation hedging demand. Capital flows into gold-related products have varied with broader market cycles, while regulatory developments around commodity ETFs remain stable. Risks include volatility in gold prices driven by central bank policies and currency fluctuations. Both GDXY and GLDM operate within this environment, with GDXY additionally sensitive to gold miners’ equity performance and options volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDXY’s options strategy has generated elevated distribution rates but introduced variability from capped gains during gold miners’ rallies. GLDM has delivered returns closely aligned with spot gold prices, exhibiting lower structural costs and direct commodity beta. Relative positioning shows GDXY with higher income potential offset by options drag and single-issuer risks, while GLDM offers more consistent tracking of bullion trends amid sector rotations and macro shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor GLDM with higher probability due to its lower expense ratio, direct physical gold exposure, simpler structure, and reduced operational complexity compared with GDXY’s higher-cost options overlay and capped participation. Structural strength and cost efficiency support this positioning in the prevailing environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXY vs. GLDM commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXY is a Hold and GLDM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDM has more net assets: 32.1B vs. GDXY (333M). GDXY has a higher annual dividend yield than GLDM: GDXY (3.714) vs GLDM (2.764). GDXY was incepted earlier than GLDM: GDXY (2 years) vs GLDM (8 years). GLDM (0.10) has a lower expense ratio than GDXY (1.00).
GDXYGLDMGDXY / GLDM
Gain YTD3.7142.764134%
Net Assets333M32.1B1%
Total Expense Ratio1.000.101,000%
Turnover36.00N/A-
Yield74.210.00-
Fund Existence2 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXYGLDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMVSX35.870.24
+0.67%
Invesco Small Cap Value R6
MMUBX25.230.07
+0.28%
MFS Utilities B
NWHNX13.470.02
+0.15%
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs Instl Svc
DGFYX33.71-0.02
-0.06%
Davis Global Y
NEAMX45.10-0.07
-0.15%
Neiman Large Cap Value A