GDXY
Price
$11.28
Change
-$0.09 (-0.79%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
332.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGOL
Price
$41.49
Change
-$0.74 (-1.75%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXY vs SGOL

GDXY vs SGOL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) vs. abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL)

Key Takeaways

  • YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) employs an actively managed synthetic covered call strategy on the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) to generate high current income while providing indirect exposure to gold miners, subject to caps on upside participation.
  • abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is a passively managed, physically backed grantor trust that holds allocated gold bullion to track the spot price of gold minus expenses, offering direct commodity exposure without equity or options components.
  • Structural differences include GDXY’s higher expense ratio of approximately 1.00% and focus on option premiums versus SGOL’s low 0.17% expense ratio and reliance on physical metal storage and security.
  • GDXY features a concentrated portfolio dominated by U.S. Treasury bills as collateral alongside options positions, while SGOL maintains 100% allocation to physical gold bullion in secure vaults.
  • Both ETFs target the gold sector but differ in risk profiles: GDXY introduces options-related volatility and income variability, whereas SGOL provides straightforward exposure to gold price movements influenced by macroeconomic factors.
  • Positioning favors SGOL for pure gold price tracking and cost efficiency, while GDXY suits investors seeking enhanced yield within gold miners exposure, subject to strategy limitations.

Introduction

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) represent distinct approaches to gold-related exposure within the broader commodities and precious metals sector. They do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for investors seeking gold sector participation: one through an income-generating options overlay on gold miners equity and the other through direct physical gold ownership. In the current market environment marked by macroeconomic uncertainty, interest rate dynamics, and commodity trends, these ETFs allow comparison of cost structures, risk exposures, and thematic positioning for diversified portfolios.

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) Overview

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in May 2024. It seeks current income as its primary objective while providing secondary indirect exposure to the share price performance of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX), subject to limits on potential gains due to its options strategy. The fund implements a synthetic covered call approach using options on GDX, collateralized primarily by short-term U.S. Treasury bills. It holds approximately 19 positions, with top holdings consisting of various Treasury bills and GDX-related options contracts. Sector allocation centers on materials and metals & mining through its GDX linkage. The gross expense ratio stands at 1.00%. As a non-diversified, actively managed product, it employs options for premium collection and does not track a traditional index, with rebalancing driven by the options overlay rather than passive methodology.

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) Overview

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is a passively managed grantor trust launched in September 2009. It seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less the trust’s expenses, by holding allocated physical gold bullion bars. The fund maintains 100% allocation to physical gold, stored in secure vaults in London, with no equity holdings or derivatives. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM benchmark through physical replication. The expense ratio is 0.17%. As a physically backed structure, SGOL emphasizes transparency with daily bar lists and periodic vault inspections, distinguishing it from synthetic or futures-based alternatives. No rebalancing occurs beyond maintaining physical holdings, and the fund does not distribute dividends.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold sector operates within the precious metals and commodities space, influenced by macroeconomic drivers including inflation expectations, interest rate policies from central banks, geopolitical developments, and U.S. dollar strength. Capital flows into gold often increase during periods of economic uncertainty or equity market volatility as a hedge. Regulatory aspects focus on custody standards and sourcing, with SGOL emphasizing responsibly sourced post-2012 gold. Both ETFs face sector risks such as commodity price volatility and storage or strategy-specific costs, though broader market cycles in gold mining equities and bullion prices shape the environment.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has delivered high distribution yields through its options strategy, though total returns reflect capped participation in gold miners movements amid volatility in equity-linked gold exposure. abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has provided more direct alignment with gold bullion price trends, exhibiting lower expense drag and straightforward performance tied to spot gold dynamics. Relative positioning shows GDXY offering income potential at the cost of upside limitations and higher fees, while SGOL emphasizes cost efficiency and unencumbered gold price exposure. Volatility differences arise from GDXY’s options components versus SGOL’s pure commodity tracking, with both influenced by sector rotation and macroeconomic shifts over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore similar opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) with higher probability due to its lower expense ratio, direct physical gold exposure, and simpler risk profile compared to the higher-cost, options-constrained approach of YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). SGOL demonstrates stronger cost efficiency and diversification within pure gold bullion, alongside consistent trend alignment in commodity cycles, while GDXY’s income focus introduces additional strategy-specific risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXY vs. SGOL commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXY is a Hold and SGOL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGOL has more net assets: 7.52B vs. GDXY (333M). GDXY has a higher annual dividend yield than SGOL: GDXY (3.714) vs SGOL (0.974). GDXY was incepted earlier than SGOL: GDXY (2 years) vs SGOL (17 years). SGOL (0.17) has a lower expense ratio than GDXY (1.00).
GDXYSGOLGDXY / SGOL
Gain YTD3.7140.974381%
Net Assets333M7.52B4%
Total Expense Ratio1.000.17588%
Turnover36.00N/A-
Yield74.210.00-
Fund Existence2 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXYSGOL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SGOL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMVSX35.870.24
+0.67%
Invesco Small Cap Value R6
MMUBX25.230.07
+0.28%
MFS Utilities B
NWHNX13.470.02
+0.15%
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs Instl Svc
DGFYX33.71-0.02
-0.06%
Davis Global Y
NEAMX45.10-0.07
-0.15%
Neiman Large Cap Value A