Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMRX vs RNWAX
GEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts GEMRX vs RNWAX
GEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMRX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMRX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GEMRX (1.02B). GEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: GEMRX (0.66) vs RNWAX (0.50). GEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: GEMRX (14 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). GEMRX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GEMRX (35.00). GEMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: GEMRX (0) vs RNWAX (250). GEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.35 vs. RNWAX (20.44). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.95 vs. GEMRX (2.91).
| GEMRX | RNWAX | GEMRX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.66 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.66 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.998 | 13.362 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.50 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.35 | 20.44 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.56 | 39.97 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.91 | 12.95 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.72 | 98.52 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers