The Aroon Indicator for GEOS entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 184 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 144 of the 184 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 78%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GEOS as a result. In 67 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GEOS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for GEOS's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GEOS just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where GEOS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +4.71% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GEOS advanced for three days, in 231 of 288 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
GEOS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.661) is normal, around the industry mean (3.496). P/E Ratio (17.025) is within average values for comparable stocks, (88.534). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.900) is also within normal values, averaging (1.687). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.708) is also within normal values, averaging (1.663).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. GEOS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. GEOS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 67, placing this stock worse than average.
STAK may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 11 of 13 cases where STAK's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where STAK's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 6 of 9 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 13 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on STAK as a result. In 30 of 33 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STAK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for STAK entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 52 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.528) is normal, around the industry mean (3.496). P/E Ratio (2.346) is within average values for comparable stocks, (88.534). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.687). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.559) is also within normal values, averaging (1.663).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. STAK’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. STAK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 67, placing this stock worse than average.
GEOS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GEOS | STAK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GEOS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while STAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEOS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STAK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
GEOS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -5.77% price change this week, while STAK (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -6.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -5.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.30%.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AUMI | 92.07 | 0.45 | +0.49% |
| Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) | |||
| RSPA | 52.88 | -0.07 | -0.13% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) | |||
| FMF | 51.77 | -0.22 | -0.42% |
| First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) | |||
| HULL | 27.08 | -0.31 | -1.13% |
| Corgi ETF Trust I Corgi Shipping & Global Logistics ETF (HULL) | |||
| QXQ | 31.56 | -0.83 | -2.55% |
| SGI Enhanced Nasdaq 100 ETF (QXQ) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that GEOS and FTK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEOS and FTK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEOS | 100% | -4.75% | ||
| FTK - GEOS | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
| VTOL - GEOS | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.01% | ||
| FET - GEOS | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
| SEI - GEOS | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.71% | ||
| NOV - GEOS | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that STAK and KLXE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STAK and KLXE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAK | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| KLXE - STAK | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RCON - STAK | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.18% | ||
| GEOS - STAK | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.75% | ||
| KGS - STAK | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| DTI - STAK | 10% Poorly correlated | +11.38% | ||
More | ||||