Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERAX vs RNWFX
GERAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GERAX vs RNWFX
GERAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GERAX (3.65B). GERAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GERAX (1.47) vs RNWFX (1.19). GERAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GERAX (19 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GERAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERAX: RNWFX (250) vs GERAX (1000). GERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.97 vs. RNWFX (19.68). GERAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.39 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| GERAX | RNWFX | GERAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.62 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.62 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.733 | 12.700 | 195% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.19 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 19.68 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.63 | 44.28 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 14.77 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.16 | 110.07 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers