Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERAX vs RNWHX
GERAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GERAX vs RNWHX
GERAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GERAX (3.65B). GERAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GERAX (1.47) vs RNWHX (1.14). GERAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GERAX (19 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GERAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERAX: RNWHX (250) vs GERAX (1000). GERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.97 vs. RNWHX (19.47). GERAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.39 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| GERAX | RNWHX | GERAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.72 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.72 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.733 | 12.651 | 196% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.14 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 19.47 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.63 | 43.67 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 14.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.16 | 107.31 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement