Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.23
Change+$0.53 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$34.43
Change+$0.34 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.04M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. HSUCX (72M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.83 vs. GFACX (14.62). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. HSUCX (-0.58).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 5.542 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 72M | 469,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.62 | 15.83 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.98 | 62.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.92 | -0.58 | -6,158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.95 | -81.16 | -102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement