Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.57
Change+$0.99 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.32B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.33
Change+$0.35 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.64M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HSUCX (73.6M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.54 vs. GFACX (17.24). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. HSUCX (-1.08).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.817 | 2.105 | 656% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 73.6M | 447,011% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.24 | 19.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.74 | 38.92 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.49 | -1.08 | -3,194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.24 | -82.47 | -84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement