Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.04
Change-$0.24 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.28B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.5M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. HSUCX (74.5M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.59 vs. GFACX (11.69). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.11 vs. HSUCX (1.16).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.794 | 2.167 | 544% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 74.5M | 436,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.69 | 15.59 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | 50.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.11 | 1.16 | 2,928% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.13 | -82.60 | -81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement