Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.58
Change-$1.08 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.2B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.74
Change-$0.56 (-1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. HSUCX (74M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUCX (11 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. GFACX (3.39). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.11 vs. HSUCX (14.50).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.286 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302B | 74M | 408,108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 12.86 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.74 | 50.30 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.11 | 14.50 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.46 | -83.88 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement