Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.35
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.99M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. HSUCX (63M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. HSUCX (-1.13). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 25.13 vs. HSUCX (-13.51).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | -2.105 | -714% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 63M | 519,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | -1.13 | -429% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.67 | 46.12 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | -13.51 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.54 | -17.72 | -398% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement