Ad is loading...
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.11
Change+$0.72 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.2B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$30.40
Change+$0.16 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.5M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 274B vs. HSUCX (69.5M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUCX (11 years). HSUCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. GFACX (1.38). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. HSUCX (15.95).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.23 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.23 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.725 | -6.378 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274B | 69.5M | 394,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | 12.75 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.35 | 26.00 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.27 | 15.95 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.89 | -84.88 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...