Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.93
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.45
Change+$0.16 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.46M
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. HSUCX (69.5M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (25 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.61 vs. HSUCX (8.47). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.99 vs. HSUCX (-6.41).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.15 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.087 | 3.065 | 623% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 69.5M | 490,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.61 | 8.47 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.21 | 67.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.99 | -6.41 | -546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.56 | -81.88 | -103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement