Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUCX
GFACX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. HSUCX (47.1M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFACX (26 years) vs HSUCX (13 years). HSUCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 267.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. HSUCX (-11.69). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.29 vs. HSUCX (-19.73).
| GFACX | HSUCX | GFACX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.12 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.12 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.990 | -6.714 | -134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 47.1M | 749,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.03 | -11.69 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 30.63 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.29 | -19.73 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.74 | -18.37 | -450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement