Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs IRLNX
GFACX vs IRLNX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs IRLNX
GFACX vs IRLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. IRLNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and IRLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. IRLNX (1.52B). IRLNX pays higher dividends than GFACX: IRLNX (0.11) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than IRLNX: GFACX (25 years) vs IRLNX (17 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than IRLNX (0.64). IRLNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). IRLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: IRLNX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. IRLNX (0.89). IRLNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.54 vs. GFACX (6.08).
| GFACX | IRLNX | GFACX / IRLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.43 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.64 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.973 | -13.759 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.52B | 23,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 0.89 | 662% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.71 | 33.20 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.08 | 21.54 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | 215.76 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement