Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KCGIX
GFACX vs KCGIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KCGIX
GFACX vs KCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KCGIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KCGIX (330M). KCGIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: KCGIX (0.04) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than KCGIX: GFACX (25 years) vs KCGIX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.75). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: GFACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.56 vs. GFACX (-2.16). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.65 vs. GFACX (2.38).
| GFACX | KCGIX | GFACX / KCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.250 | 10.354 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 330M | 108,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | 14.56 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.26 | 71.25 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.38 | 37.65 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.31 | 163.50 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement