Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KCGSX
GFACX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KCGSX
GFACX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KCGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. KCGSX (331M). KCGSX pays higher dividends than GFACX: KCGSX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GFACX (26 years) vs KCGSX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KCGSX (0.85). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KCGSX (0) vs GFACX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. GFACX (-2.39). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.12 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| GFACX | KCGSX | GFACX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.85 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.85 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 11.541 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 331M | 106,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 9.40 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 74.67 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 37.12 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 168.07 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement