Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCAX
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.51
Change-$2.32 (-3.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$14.42
Change-$0.53 (-3.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. KLCAX (1.12B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCAX (17 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCAX (1.19). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.95 vs. KLCAX (-24.80). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.74 vs. KLCAX (-40.10).
| GFACX | KLCAX | GFACX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.09 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.732 | -9.008 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 1.12B | 24,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | -24.80 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.35 | -47.00 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.74 | -40.10 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.82 | -23.72 | -164% |