Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCAX
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.27
Change-$0.64 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$23.16
Change-$0.16 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCAX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and KLCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. KLCAX (1.56B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCAX (17 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCAX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.12 vs. KLCAX (1.83). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. KLCAX (-16.62).
| GFACX | KLCAX | GFACX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.927 | 26.808 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 1.56B | 19,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.12 | 1.83 | 1,587% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.45 | -42.19 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | -16.62 | -291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.85 | 24.91 | 236% |