Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCAX
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$16.66
Change-$0.41 (-2.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. KLCAX (1.35B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCAX (17 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCAX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. KLCAX (-15.82). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. KLCAX (-44.91).
| GFACX | KLCAX | GFACX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 1.400 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 1.35B | 22,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | -15.82 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | -40.14 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | -44.91 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -13.32 | -418% |