Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCAX
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCAX
GFACX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCAX (1.14B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCAX (19 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KLCAX (1.20). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.89 vs. KLCAX (-8.47). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.03 vs. KLCAX (-56.75).
| GFACX | KLCAX | GFACX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.09 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.147 | 14.097 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.14B | 31,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | -8.47 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | -23.15 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.03 | -56.75 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.68 | -12.88 | -634% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers