Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.77
Change+$0.57 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. KLCCX (1.25B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. KLCCX (-28.81). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.27 vs. KLCCX (-56.46).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.426 | 7.810 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319B | 1.25B | 25,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | -28.81 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.72 | -44.56 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.27 | -56.46 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.33 | -38.38 | -170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement