Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.92
Change+$1.26 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$9.38
Change+$0.21 (+2.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. KLCCX (1.07B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCCX (17 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.27 vs. KLCCX (-36.45). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.45 vs. KLCCX (-60.41).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.136 | -12.667 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 1.07B | 24,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | -36.45 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.96 | -60.15 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.45 | -60.41 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.91 | -51.17 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...