Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.64B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$10.63
Change-$0.26 (-2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. KLCCX (1.35B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCCX (17 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCCX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. KLCCX (-26.17). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. KLCCX (-59.86).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 3.714 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 1.35B | 23,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | -26.17 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | -54.57 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | -59.86 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -40.20 | -138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...