Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.52
Change+$0.63 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.41B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$11.46
Change-$0.12 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 322B vs. KLCCX (1.25B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.41 vs. KLCCX (-19.13). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.13 vs. KLCCX (-59.89).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.171 | 10.286 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322B | 1.25B | 25,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.41 | -19.13 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | -48.40 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.13 | -59.89 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.85 | -37.17 | -183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement