Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.90
Change+$0.75 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$10.74
Change+$0.07 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and KLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. KLCCX (1.36B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCCX (17 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCCX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. KLCCX (-22.90). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.07 vs. KLCCX (-59.04).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.356 | 2.286 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 1.36B | 22,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | -22.90 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | -58.52 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.07 | -59.04 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.62 | -36.56 | -179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...