Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLCCX (1.3B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. KLCCX (-23.46). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. KLCCX (-57.86).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.460 | 16.857 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 1.3B | 26,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | -23.46 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | -39.56 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.58 | -57.86 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.91 | -28.58 | -304% |