Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$9.23
Change-$0.49 (-5.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. KLCCX (1.15B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCCX (17 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. KLCCX (-34.90). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. KLCCX (-51.93).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -7.429 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 1.15B | 24,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -34.90 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | -62.34 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | -51.93 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | -47.15 | -94% |