Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCCX
GFACX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCCX (1.18B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCCX (19 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFACX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. KLCCX (-21.39). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.24 vs. KLCCX (-74.00).
| GFACX | KLCCX | GFACX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.336 | 15.825 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.18B | 30,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | -21.39 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | -50.64 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.24 | -74.00 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.48 | -49.52 | -187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers