Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCIX
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$58.83
Change+$5.60 (+10.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$16.76
Change+$1.59 (+10.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. KLCIX (1.02B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCIX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCIX (17 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: GFACX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.80 vs. KLCIX (-30.19). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.34 vs. KLCIX (-41.13).
| GFACX | KLCIX | GFACX / KLCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.515 | -17.554 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246B | 1.02B | 24,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.80 | -30.19 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.38 | -49.53 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.34 | -41.13 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.16 | -23.85 | -106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...