Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCIX
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.68
Change+$1.40 (+1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.81B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
Price$20.42
Change+$0.36 (+1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCIX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. KLCIX (1.24B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCIX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCIX (18 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.94). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: GFACX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. KLCIX (-6.74). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.36 vs. KLCIX (-39.63).
| GFACX | KLCIX | GFACX / KLCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.422 | 9.022 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320B | 1.24B | 25,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | -6.74 | -254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.95 | -26.65 | -150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.36 | -39.63 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.22 | 1.16 | 5,882% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement