Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCIX
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCIX
GFACX vs KLCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLCIX (1.14B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCIX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCIX (19 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.95). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: GFACX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. KLCIX (-4.21). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.34 vs. KLCIX (-51.34).
| GFACX | KLCIX | GFACX / KLCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.95 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.746 | 14.013 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.14B | 31,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | -4.21 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | -17.94 | -173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.34 | -51.34 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.97 | -0.98 | -8,026% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement