Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.14
Change-$8.99 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$18.91
Change-$0.71 (-3.62%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. KLCSX (1.5B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCSX (11 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCSX (19.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.28 vs. KLCSX (-2.87). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.11 vs. KLCSX (-31.33).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.964 | -2.679 | -1,231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313B | 1.5B | 20,867% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.28 | -2.87 | -1,194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | -43.46 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.11 | -31.33 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.77 | 2.51 | 3,181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...