Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.38
Change-$0.14 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$20.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. KLCSX (1.27B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.28 vs. KLCSX (-2.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.87 vs. KLCSX (-37.46).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.951 | 11.705 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 1.27B | 25,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.28 | -2.06 | -935% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | -23.86 | -163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.87 | -37.46 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.31 | 3.93 | 1,662% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement