Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$22.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLCSX (1.3B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (25 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. KLCSX (-7.12). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. KLCSX (-34.85).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.460 | 17.905 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 1.3B | 26,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | -7.12 | -190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | -11.58 | -523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.58 | -34.85 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.91 | 19.05 | 456% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement