Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.34
Change+$0.45 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$21.25
Change+$0.22 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KLCSX (1.25B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.55 vs. KLCSX (-9.24). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.67 vs. KLCSX (-39.97).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.025 | 12.400 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 1.25B | 26,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.55 | -9.24 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.95 | -20.16 | -238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.67 | -39.97 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.75 | 10.57 | 755% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement