Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.58
Change-$0.13 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$23.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and KLCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 290B vs. KLCSX (1.53B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCSX (11 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCSX (19.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.04 vs. KLCSX (3.59). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. KLCSX (-14.92).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.055 | 18.800 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290B | 1.53B | 19,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.04 | 3.59 | 781% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.58 | -40.73 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.21 | -14.92 | -303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.57 | 30.87 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...