Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$16.50
Change-$0.88 (-5.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. KLCSX (1.15B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCSX (11 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. KLCSX (-21.00). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. KLCSX (-25.69).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -7.108 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 1.15B | 24,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -21.00 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | -44.90 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | -25.69 | -232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | -11.91 | -373% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers