Ad is loading...
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$18.98
Change-$0.47 (-2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and KLCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. KLCSX (1.35B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (24 years) vs KLCSX (11 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCSX (19.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. KLCSX (-12.57). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. KLCSX (-39.44).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 1.443 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 1.35B | 22,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | -12.57 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | -35.11 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | -39.44 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -2.77 | -2,011% |