Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs KLCSX
GFACX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. KLCSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and KLCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. KLCSX (1.1B). GFACX (0.00) and KLCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFACX (26 years) vs KLCSX (13 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.88). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: KLCSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. KLCSX (-10.45). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. KLCSX (-53.20).
| GFACX | KLCSX | GFACX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.78 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.88 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 12.886 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.1B | 32,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -10.45 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | -19.60 | -176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | -53.20 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 0.47 | 17,627% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement