Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LCGFX
GFACX vs LCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LCGFX
GFACX vs LCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LCGFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LCGFX (1.88B). GFACX (0.00) and LCGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LCGFX: GFACX (25 years) vs LCGFX (27 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than LCGFX (0.75). LCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGFX: GFACX (250) vs LCGFX (500000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. LCGFX (-0.83). LCGFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.04 vs. GFACX (6.34).
| GFACX | LCGFX | GFACX / LCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.746 | 2.954 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.88B | 18,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | -0.83 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | 38.57 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.34 | 24.04 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.97 | 188.13 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement