Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LCGNX
GFACX vs LCGNX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LCGNX
GFACX vs LCGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LCGNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LCGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LCGNX (1.78B). GFACX (0.00) and LCGNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LCGNX: GFACX (26 years) vs LCGNX (27 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than LCGNX (1.02). LCGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGNX: GFACX (250) vs LCGNX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. LCGNX (-9.32). LCGNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.19 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| GFACX | LCGNX | GFACX / LCGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.02 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 0.797 | 1,070% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.78B | 19,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -9.32 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 33.67 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 15.19 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 172.22 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement