Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LEGCX
GFACX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.57
Change+$0.61 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$45.07
Change+$0.43 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
GFACX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LEGCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. LEGCX (5.32B). GFACX (0.00) and LEGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFACX (24 years) vs LEGCX (22 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFACX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.11 vs. LEGCX (-1.50). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. LEGCX (52.98).
| GFACX | LEGCX | GFACX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.73 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.73 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -10.433 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 5.32B | 5,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | -1.50 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.31 | 8.93 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 52.98 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.29 | 40.47 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...