Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LEGCX
GFACX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LEGCX
GFACX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LEGCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LEGCX (7.02B). GFACX (0.00) and LEGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LEGCX (24 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFACX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). LEGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.09 vs. GFACX (12.09). LEGCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.28 vs. GFACX (14.79).
| GFACX | LEGCX | GFACX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.72 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.72 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.104 | 11.253 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 7.02B | 4,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 15.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.36 | 47.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | 31.28 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.17 | 98.63 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers