Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$58.10
Change-$0.11 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LGLFX (7.94B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.60 vs. GFACX (9.41). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. LGLFX (24.65).
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 18.017 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 7.94B | 4,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 29.60 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 116.71 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 24.65 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 149.68 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement