Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$49.94
Change-$1.86 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.16B
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. LGLFX (7.16B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.95 vs. GFACX (10.15). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.31 vs. GFACX (32.83).
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 1.442 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 7.16B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 27.95 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 44.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 56.31 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | 113.69 | 49% |