Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$45.99
Change+$0.65 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. LGLFX (6.32B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.09 vs. GFACX (1.60). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.49 vs. GFACX (34.66).
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.682 | -8.308 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 6.32B | 4,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | 15.09 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 48.19 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.66 | 39.49 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | 94.65 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...