Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.87
Change+$0.47 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$58.07
Change+$0.51 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.85B
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLFX (7.85B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. GFACX (7.12). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.64 vs. GFACX (25.28).
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.993 | 17.957 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 7.85B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 17.53 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.77 | 117.57 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.28 | 32.64 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.78 | 151.71 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement