Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MBCZX
GFACX vs MBCZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MBCZX
GFACX vs MBCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MBCZX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MBCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCZX (1.83B). GFACX (0.00) and MBCZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MBCZX: GFACX (25 years) vs MBCZX (12 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MBCZX (0.66). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCZX (14.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: MBCZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.16 vs. MBCZX (-27.80). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 2.38 vs. MBCZX (-46.93).
| GFACX | MBCZX | GFACX / MBCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.66 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.66 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.250 | -2.655 | -160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.83B | 19,530% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | -27.80 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.26 | -17.22 | -164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.38 | -46.93 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.31 | 18.03 | 418% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement