Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MEGBX
GFACX vs MEGBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MEGBX
GFACX vs MEGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MEGBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MEGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MEGBX (38.1B). GFACX (0.00) and MEGBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MEGBX: GFACX (26 years) vs MEGBX (40 years). MEGBX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). MEGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEGBX: GFACX (250) vs MEGBX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. MEGBX (-17.82). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. MEGBX (-19.23).
| GFACX | MEGBX | GFACX / MEGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.61 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.62 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 1.525 | 559% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 38.1B | 927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -17.82 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | -2.16 | -1,598% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | -19.23 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 89.84 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement