Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MGNDX
GFACX vs MGNDX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MGNDX
GFACX vs MGNDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MGNDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MGNDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MGNDX (827M). MGNDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MGNDX (0.05) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MGNDX: GFACX (26 years) vs MGNDX (19 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MGNDX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MGNDX (17.99). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGNDX: GFACX (250) vs MGNDX (2500). MGNDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. GFACX (-2.39). MGNDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.05 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| GFACX | MGNDX | GFACX / MGNDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.62 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.62 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 8.586 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 827M | 42,684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 8.31 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 68.91 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 45.05 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 234.68 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement