Ad is loading...
GFACX vs MLAAX
GFACX vs MLAAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLAAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.51
Change-$2.32 (-3.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$8.34
Change-$0.35 (-4.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.04B
GFACX vs MLAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLAAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MLAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. MLAAX (12B). GFACX (0.00) and MLAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLAAX: GFACX (24 years) vs MLAAX (30 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than MLAAX (0.95). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: GFACX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.95 vs. MLAAX (-17.34). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.74 vs. MLAAX (-1.30).
| GFACX | MLAAX | GFACX / MLAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.95 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.732 | -12.670 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 12B | 2,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | -17.34 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.35 | -13.13 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.74 | -1.30 | -3,130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.82 | -20.50 | -189% |