Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLAAX
GFACX vs MLAAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLAAX
GFACX vs MLAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLAAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MLAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLAAX (12.6B). GFACX (0.00) and MLAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLAAX: GFACX (25 years) vs MLAAX (31 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MLAAX (0.95). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: GFACX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. MLAAX (-13.36). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.34 vs. MLAAX (-34.39).
| GFACX | MLAAX | GFACX / MLAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.94 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.95 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.746 | 3.299 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 12.6B | 2,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | -13.36 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | 1.11 | 2,792% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.34 | -34.39 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.97 | -1.94 | -4,063% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers