Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLRSX
GFACX vs MLRSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLRSX
GFACX vs MLRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLRSX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MLRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLRSX (12.4B). GFACX (0.00) and MLRSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLRSX: GFACX (25 years) vs MLRSX (13 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MLRSX (0.64). MLRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). MLRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: MLRSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.89 vs. MLRSX (-8.20). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.03 vs. MLRSX (-20.76).
| GFACX | MLRSX | GFACX / MLRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.63 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.64 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.147 | 4.855 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 12.4B | 2,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | -8.20 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 19.05 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.03 | -20.76 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.68 | 27.41 | 298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement