Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLRSX
GFACX vs MLRSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLRSX
GFACX vs MLRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLRSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MLRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MLRSX (11.5B). GFACX (0.00) and MLRSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLRSX: GFACX (26 years) vs MLRSX (13 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MLRSX (0.64). MLRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). MLRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: MLRSX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. MLRSX (-11.88). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. MLRSX (-25.98).
| GFACX | MLRSX | GFACX / MLRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.63 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.64 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 2.981 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 11.5B | 3,070% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -11.88 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 14.49 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | -25.98 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 24.88 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement