Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MRFOX
GFACX vs MRFOX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MRFOX
GFACX vs MRFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MRFOX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MRFOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MRFOX (1.3B). MRFOX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MRFOX (0.63) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MRFOX: GFACX (25 years) vs MRFOX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MRFOX (1.10). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MRFOX (6.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRFOX: GFACX (250) vs MRFOX (10000). MRFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. GFACX (3.45). MRFOX return over 5 years is better than : 56.06 vs. GFACX (6.24).
| GFACX | MRFOX | GFACX / MRFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.02 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.10 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.489 | 5.395 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.3B | 27,812% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.63 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.45 | 11.53 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 43.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.24 | 56.06 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.53 | 276.24 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement