Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NGRDX
GFACX vs NGRDX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NGRDX
GFACX vs NGRDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NGRDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and NGRDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NGRDX (2.59B). GFACX (0.00) and NGRDX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NGRDX: GFACX (26 years) vs NGRDX (7 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NGRDX (0.56). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NGRDX (30.00). NGRDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: NGRDX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. NGRDX (-3.37). NGRDX return over 5 years is better than : 11.29 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| GFACX | NGRDX | GFACX / NGRDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.55 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.56 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 7.299 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 2.59B | 13,629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -3.37 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 33.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 11.29 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement