Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NICSX
GFACX vs NICSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NICSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
GFACX vs NICSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NICSX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and NICSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NICSX (4.12B). NICSX pays higher dividends than GFACX: NICSX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than NICSX: GFACX (25 years) vs NICSX (56 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NICSX (0.70). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NICSX (15.41). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NICSX: GFACX (250) vs NICSX (500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. NICSX (-3.29). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. NICSX (29.57).
| GFACX | NICSX | GFACX / NICSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.70 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.70 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | -1.673 | -1,025% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 4.12B | 8,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | -3.29 | -474% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.17 | 32.50 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 29.57 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.02 | 40.15 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement