Ad is loading...
GFACX vs NICSX
GFACX vs NICSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NICSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.57
Change+$0.61 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
GFACX vs NICSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NICSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and NICSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NICSX (4B). NICSX pays higher dividends than GFACX: NICSX (0.29) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than NICSX: GFACX (24 years) vs NICSX (56 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NICSX (0.70). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NICSX (10.67). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NICSX: GFACX (250) vs NICSX (500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.11 vs. NICSX (-4.44). NICSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.73 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| GFACX | NICSX | GFACX / NICSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.70 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.70 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -3.690 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 4B | 6,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | -4.44 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.31 | 12.19 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 67.73 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.29 | 30.64 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...