Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NICSX
GFACX vs NICSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NICSX
GFACX vs NICSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NICSX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and NICSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NICSX (4B). NICSX pays higher dividends than GFACX: NICSX (0.03) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than NICSX: GFACX (25 years) vs NICSX (57 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NICSX (0.70). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NICSX (9.04). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NICSX: GFACX (250) vs NICSX (500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.86 vs. NICSX (2.63). NICSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.47 vs. GFACX (9.13).
| GFACX | NICSX | GFACX / NICSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 57 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.009 | 4.708 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 4B | 8,936% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 2.63 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 13.79 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.13 | 14.47 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.09 | 51.76 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement