Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NLCCX
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.04
Change-$0.74 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.94B
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.15
Change-$0.32 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.55M
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NLCCX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and NLCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NLCCX (837M). GFACX (0.00) and NLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFACX (25 years) vs NLCCX (28 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. GFACX (9.56). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. NLCCX (-13.33).
| GFACX | NLCCX | GFACX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.64 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.64 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.691 | 13.508 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 837M | 40,382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 11.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.06 | 39.79 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.00 | -13.33 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.48 | 34.70 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement