Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NLCCX
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.28
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.08
Change-$0.11 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.35M
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NLCCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and NLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NLCCX (849M). GFACX (0.00) and NLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFACX (25 years) vs NLCCX (28 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.11 vs. GFACX (15.28). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.56 vs. NLCCX (-9.23).
| GFACX | NLCCX | GFACX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.59 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.59 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.068 | 12.636 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 849M | 40,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.28 | 16.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 32.71 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.56 | -9.23 | -418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.37 | 29.02 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement