Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NLCCX
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NLCCX
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NLCCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and NLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NLCCX (775M). GFACX (0.00) and NLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFACX (25 years) vs NLCCX (29 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. NLCCX (-3.59). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.24 vs. NLCCX (-27.47).
| GFACX | NLCCX | GFACX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.64 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.64 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.336 | 7.265 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 775M | 46,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | -3.59 | -259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | 33.42 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.24 | -27.47 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.48 | 18.46 | 501% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement