Ad is loading...
GFACX vs NWZLX
GFACX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.14
Change-$8.99 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.53
Change-$0.77 (-3.62%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NWZLX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and NWZLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. NWZLX (217M). GFACX (0.00) and NWZLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: GFACX (24 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NWZLX (12.63). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: GFACX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.28 vs. NWZLX (31.73). NWZLX return over 5 years is better than : 64.86 vs. GFACX (47.11).
| GFACX | NWZLX | GFACX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.964 | 39.581 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313B | 217M | 144,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.28 | 31.73 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | 12.82 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.11 | 64.86 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...