Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PRGFX
GFACX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$91.44
Change-$5.37 (-5.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.62B
GFACX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PRGFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. PRGFX (45.6B). GFACX (0.00) and PRGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFACX (24 years) vs PRGFX (75 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PRGFX (0.65). PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFACX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). PRGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. GFACX (-1.75). PRGFX return over 5 years is better than : 63.81 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| GFACX | PRGFX | GFACX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 75 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -8.202 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 45.6B | 614% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -0.10 | 1,698% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 4.63 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 63.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 76.05 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...