Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PRGFX
GFACX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PRGFX
GFACX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PRGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PRGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PRGFX (50.4B). GFACX (0.00) and PRGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFACX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than PRGFX (0.66). PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFACX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. PRGFX (5.67). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.24 vs. PRGFX (0.22).
| GFACX | PRGFX | GFACX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.66 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.66 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.336 | 3.524 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 50.4B | 716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 5.67 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | 39.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.24 | 0.22 | 4,279% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.48 | 126.97 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers