Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.89
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.50
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.15M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. SBHAX (92.2M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.21) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.95 vs. SBHAX (-10.30). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.88 vs. SBHAX (6.43).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.319 | 4.506 | 318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 92.2M | 355,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | -10.30 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 0.62 | 7,446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.88 | 6.43 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.96 | 73.99 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement