Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.41
Change-$0.22 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$19.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.64M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. SBHAX (92.6M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.22) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. SBHAX (-10.77). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.58 vs. SBHAX (10.97).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.501 | -0.512 | -879% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 92.6M | 329,374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | -10.77 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | -6.04 | -526% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.58 | 10.97 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.81 | 61.83 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers