Ad is loading...
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$18.00
Change-$0.79 (-4.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.41M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. SBHAX (92.4M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.23) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.91). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. SBHAX (-12.46). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. SBHAX (42.15).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -3.789 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 92.4M | 303,030% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -12.46 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | -15.25 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 42.15 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 59.11 | 75% |