Ad is loading...
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.90
Change+$0.75 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.12
Change+$0.14 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.84M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SBHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. SBHAX (107M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.48) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBHAX (11 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. SBHAX (1.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.07 vs. SBHAX (16.02).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.356 | 3.021 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 107M | 286,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | 1.01 | 1,976% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | -10.25 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.07 | 16.02 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.62 | 84.71 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...