Ad is loading...
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$19.39
Change-$0.38 (-1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.25M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. SBHAX (98.3M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.48) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. SBHAX (-8.44). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. SBHAX (11.81).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | -0.717 | -416% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 98.3M | 309,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | -8.44 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | -9.23 | -192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 11.81 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | 66.13 | 84% |