Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.44
Change-$0.49 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.90
Change-$0.12 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.78M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. SBHAX (91.8M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. SBHAX (-8.18). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. SBHAX (8.89).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.319 | 7.629 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 91.8M | 373,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | -8.18 | -157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.12 | 13.16 | 510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.31 | 8.89 | 375% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.37 | 77.99 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement