Ad is loading...
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.92
Change+$1.26 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$17.87
Change+$0.32 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.22M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. SBHAX (85.2M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.23) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.91). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.27 vs. SBHAX (-15.86). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.45 vs. SBHAX (14.86).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.136 | -10.138 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 85.2M | 307,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | -15.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.96 | -15.30 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.45 | 14.86 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.91 | 46.65 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...