Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.53
Change-$0.18 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.06M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. SBHAX (84.1M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. SBHAX (-12.25). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. SBHAX (1.97).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.445 | 6.042 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 84.1M | 392,390% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | -12.25 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 4.44 | 1,236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.08 | 1.97 | 1,225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.66 | 71.50 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement