Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SBHAX (48.8M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.05) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (13 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.97). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. SBHAX (-5.60). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.08 vs. SBHAX (-23.06).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.97 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.973 | 11.790 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 48.8M | 739,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | -5.60 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.71 | -3.50 | -1,048% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.08 | -23.06 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | 61.54 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers