Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SGRAX
GFACX vs SGRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SGRAX
GFACX vs SGRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SGRAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SGRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. SGRAX (3.2B). GFACX (0.00) and SGRAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SGRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SGRAX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SGRAX (1.18). SGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGRAX: GFACX (250) vs SGRAX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. SGRAX (-18.71). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.79 vs. SGRAX (-51.56).
| GFACX | SGRAX | GFACX / SGRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.15 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.18 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.104 | 7.282 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 3.2B | 10,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | -18.71 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.36 | -22.29 | -199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | -51.56 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.17 | -49.93 | -177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement