Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SGRHX
GFACX vs SGRHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SGRHX
GFACX vs SGRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SGRHX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SGRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SGRHX (2.95B). GFACX (0.00) and SGRHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SGRHX: GFACX (25 years) vs SGRHX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SGRHX (0.76). SGRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). SGRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: SGRHX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.97 vs. SGRHX (-12.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 1.52 vs. SGRHX (-34.57).
| GFACX | SGRHX | GFACX / SGRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.76 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.373 | 2.923 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 2.95B | 12,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.97 | -12.10 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 3.98 | 668% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.52 | -34.57 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.19 | -7.77 | -942% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement