Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SGRHX
GFACX vs SGRHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SGRHX
GFACX vs SGRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SGRHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SGRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SGRHX (2.79B). GFACX (0.00) and SGRHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SGRHX: GFACX (26 years) vs SGRHX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SGRHX (0.76). SGRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). SGRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: SGRHX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. SGRHX (-20.47). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. SGRHX (-37.24).
| GFACX | SGRHX | GFACX / SGRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.76 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | -0.613 | -1,392% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 2.79B | 12,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -20.47 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 3.21 | 1,075% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | -37.24 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | -9.84 | -837% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement