Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRIHX
GFACX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRIHX
GFACX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRIHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TRIHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TRIHX (18.2B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than GFACX: TRIHX (0.43) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRIHX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: GFACX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. GFACX (-0.98). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.60 vs. GFACX (3.92).
| GFACX | TRIHX | GFACX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.156 | 0.422 | 1,222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 18.2B | 1,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | 3.99 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | 57.36 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.92 | 35.60 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.09 | 250.58 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers