Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRIHX
GFACX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRIHX
GFACX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRIHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TRIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRIHX (18.7B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than GFACX: TRIHX (0.40) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRIHX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: GFACX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. GFACX (5.89). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.02 vs. GFACX (6.08).
| GFACX | TRIHX | GFACX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.973 | 4.417 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 18.7B | 1,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 17.99 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.71 | 72.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.08 | 48.02 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | 291.18 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers