Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRIHX
GFACX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRIHX
GFACX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRIHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TRIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TRIHX (19B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than GFACX: TRIHX (0.41) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRIHX (11 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: GFACX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. GFACX (1.73). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.14 vs. GFACX (6.34).
| GFACX | TRIHX | GFACX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.12 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.746 | 5.195 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 19B | 1,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 12.21 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | 66.50 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.34 | 43.14 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.97 | 270.69 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers