Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRIRX
GFACX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRIRX
GFACX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRIRX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRIRX (18.7B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than GFACX: TRIRX (0.26) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRIRX (24 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.29). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIRX (27.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TRIRX (0) vs GFACX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. GFACX (5.82). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.79 vs. GFACX (8.45).
| GFACX | TRIRX | GFACX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.29 | 466% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.29 | 466% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.241 | 2.855 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 18.7B | 1,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 14.28 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.16 | 69.24 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.45 | 48.79 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.56 | 275.34 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers