Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRJZX
GFACX vs TRJZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRJZX
GFACX vs TRJZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRJZX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TRJZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRJZX (49.4B). TRJZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: TRJZX (0.10) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than TRJZX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRJZX (6 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRJZX (0.51). TRJZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFACX (32.00). TRJZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TRJZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.01 vs. TRJZX (4.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.76 vs. TRJZX (5.68).
| GFACX | TRJZX | GFACX / TRJZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.51 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.123 | 1.680 | 543% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 49.4B | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.01 | 4.01 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 38.90 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.76 | 5.68 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement