Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRSAX
GFACX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRSAX
GFACX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TRSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TRSAX (48.7B). GFACX (0.00) and TRSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: GFACX (26 years) vs TRSAX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRSAX (0.92). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: GFACX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. TRSAX (-8.35). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. TRSAX (-8.69).
| GFACX | TRSAX | GFACX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 1.341 | 636% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 48.7B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -8.35 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 28.66 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | -8.69 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 99.73 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement