Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRSAX
GFACX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRSAX
GFACX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TRSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRSAX (49.8B). GFACX (0.00) and TRSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRSAX (24 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TRSAX (0.92). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: GFACX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. TRSAX (4.73). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.08 vs. TRSAX (-2.20).
| GFACX | TRSAX | GFACX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.973 | 3.397 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 49.8B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 4.73 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.71 | 37.15 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.08 | -2.20 | -276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | 118.31 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers